Blog Post

Energy Supplier iSupply to pay £1.5 million for Priority Service Register and charging failings

Richard Simmonds • Jun 18, 2020

Energy supply company, iSupply Energy will pay £1.5 million in goodwill payments and refunds after it admitted that over 115,000 of its customers were negatively affected by historic failings.

Multiple Failings

The supplier self-reported to the regulator that it had overcharged its customers and failed to keep its Priority Service Register for its most vulnerable users updated.

Incorrect recording of customer statuses resulted in inaccuracies to their PSR which impacted the most vulnerable.

What is the Priority Service Register (PSR)?

The PSR is a free service provided by energy suppliers and network operators to customers in vulnerable situations.


A customer can sign up to the register if they are:

  • Of pensionable age (currently 65 or over)
  • Are disabled or suffer from a chronic illness
  • Have a long-term medical condition
  • Have a hearing or visual impairment or additional communication needs
  • Are in a vulnerable situation including customers with certain mental health issues that may impact their understanding of their energy bills
  • Customers who are unable to top-up a prepayment meter due to an injury
  • Temporary circumstances where they may need extra support
  • Families with children 5 years old or younger

Read more: Add your customers to the Priority Service Register with Dyball’s CRM

Other Failings

According to the energy regulator Ofgem, the failings were reported to have occurred between 2013 and 2019 and impacted over 115,000 customers.


Ofgem also revealed that whilst carrying out its compliance work it found that iSupply were incorrectly charging for contract renewals and were using incorrect VAT rates on certain charges levied to customers.


Other failings recorded by Ofgem included:

  • Incorrect charges applied during contract renewals: iSupply failed to maintain some customers’ existing tariff rates when switching to a different supplier or iSupply tariff following a price rise notification or the end of a fixed-term tariff
  • Incorrect VAT application: iSupply applied incorrect VAT rates to certain charges levied on customers.
  • Incorrect cheapest tariff messages appearing on customer communications
  • Incorrect recording of customer status: affecting the Priority Service Register and vulnerable customers
  • Misallocation of payments: several customer payments were allocated to the wrong accounts


“iSupply had insufficient governance and processes in place to prevent and swiftly address non-compliance, which resulted in a range of issues that ultimately caused consumer harm,” said Ofgem in its report.


The £1.5 million redress package is broken down into the following:

  • Direct customer refunds worth £809,220.41
  • Voluntary Redress fund payment worth £95,489.59
  • Customer goodwill payments totalling £595,290


iSupply’s parent company reached a deal to transfer their energy contracts to EDF.


Improvements made

“iSupply Energy always endeavours to act with our customers’ best interests in mind. Earlier this year we identified shortfalls in our service levels and worked hard to put this right for impacted customers. We recognised the seriousness of this situation and agreed with Ofgem to pay £95,489.59 in the Energy Industry Voluntary Redress Scheme.


We’d like to offer assurances that all affected customers have been reimbursed with any detriment and a goodwill gesture offered, along with a full and sincere apology. The maturity of our compliance capability has grown over time with investment in training, resources, and governance. Our leadership team continues to focus on ensuring management of our customer accounts is in line with Ofgem’s license conditions until the customer migration to EDF is concluded in a few weeks,” said an iSupply spokesperson. 


A lesson for Energy Suppliers

To avoid committing the same regulatory mistakes and failings as iSupply energy suppliers should seek out the advice and expertise of our managed services team.


Dyball Associates Managed Service team has an outstanding reputation in the energy supply industry and we currently handle data quality and industry dataflow processing for over 1.5 million-meter points. Each energy supplier is assigned a dedicated point of contact and work routines from the Market Messaging Systems are handled on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis, as required. 


Click here to find out more.


Energy suppliers should have robust risk management and governance processes in place that allow them to anticipate, escalate and mitigate the risk of any harm to the consumer. Suppliers also need to have systems in place that allow them to make fixes quickly and easily to systems and processes instead of relying on slow moving manual workarounds. Dyball’s CRM system for example. 


Further Reading

Electricity Switching down 15% year on year in May and SSE reports drop in profits


Challenger Energy Suppliers should improve their mobile experiences says new report


Feed in Tariff costs could soar to record highs due to Covid-19 and exceptional weather conditions


Dyball Associates are proud to help new supply businesses successfully launch in the UK market.

 

Through our energy market consultancy services, and the software we’ve developed, we’re supporting new UK electricity and gas suppliers get set up and start supplying.

 

For more information on how to start and manage an energy company, get in touch with Dyball Associates today.

More articles

Latest News

White label
By Richard Simmonds 24 Nov, 2021
We take a look at white labelling and why it could be a good source of revenue for your business.
dim bulb
By Richard Simmonds 23 Nov, 2021
The ongoing energy crisis has claimed its biggest victim as the UK’s seventh largest energy supplier, Bulb announced that it has entered administration.
investigate
By Richard Simmonds 22 Nov, 2021
Two of the UK’s largest energy supply companies could be investigated by Ofgem and possibly face fines of up to 10% of their revenue after being accused of breaching price cap rules by overcharging customers by hundreds of pounds.
More Posts
Share by: